Web
13th Floor

July 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Statehouse Blogs

The most interesting blogs covering state capitols! Lefties, righties and centrists welcome. Suggest your favorites here.

BlogWire

A round-up of the latest news from state & local blogs.

« Mississippi's Still the Nation's Fattest State | Main | Learning a Lesson from Private-Sector Clinics »

Thursday, July 31, 2008

omg u guyz: Illinois' Proposed Walking/Texting Ban Still Has Legs

posted by Zach Patton

Walktext Texting-while-walking could become a crime in Illinois: Several officials, including the Illinois secretary of state, have voiced approval for a bill that would outlaw the practice.

Is this merely the next logical step after so many states and cities have passed bans on using handheld cell phones while driving? Or is this a pointless step too far?

More importantly, would you be affected?  Are you a texter-walker?

Comments

This same topic was covered by Seattle TV (KING5) last night, only as a personal safety issue. Falling off curbs was cited, for instance, as a hazard of texting while walking. We were laughing at it! At some level people need to take personal responsibility for their actions, and this crosses the line for me. Taking legislative action is ridiculous.

What's stupid about this is that it displays a stunning ignorance of the law. Said ignorance is to be expected in Illinois, where only the Law of the Jungle governs our roads, but I'm surprised to hear the same of Seattle.

1. If a pedestrian is crossing the street in a crosswalk (and not against a Stop signal), s/he has unconditional right of way, and drivers must yield. Nothing else matters.

2. If a pedestrian is crossing the street against a signal or outside of a crosswalk, s/he is jaywalking and already breaking the law.

So, what possible circumstances are being legislated against here?

I don't think getting hit by a bus is the issue here. If someone is busy texting and trips over a curb (man hole cover, street plate), falls and breaks a bone, who pays? The city would. It is a liability issue.

Somebody has too much time on their hands if they are seriously thinking about this. Our forebears fought a very bloody war about loss of personal liberty to government in the 18th century. It is, of course, the nature of government to take as much power as people allow. Here is a good example.

Liability has forced this issue to be addressed. The person too busy texting or talking on a cell phone will get injured and sue any one one they can think of instead of taking personal responsibility. Instead of using legislation, there should be guidelines enacted to stop frivolous lawsuits based on foolishness such as texting while walking.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment